Politics

Minority demand breakdown of $34m cost involved in relocating Ameri deal

The Minority in Parliament has demanded that government provides a breakdown of the $34 million it said is the cost of relocating the Ameri deal.

A member of the Energy Committee in Parliament, Edward Bawa disclosed that government said the relocation of the deal would cost the state an amount of $34 million.

This, he said was revealed after the Mines and Energy committee met with a number of Agencies in the Mines and Energy sector over the weekend.

According to Edward Bawa, the transaction must be halted as the economy is currently facing a huge crisis.

“As a Minority, we demand the breakdown of this cost, particularly when the country is having difficulties paying salaries and servicing our debt. The Energy sector is under serious challenges and therefore such opaque transactions must be halted in the supreme interest of every Ghanaian,” he noted.

The Bongo MP stressed that “answers were not forthcoming” when the Minority demanded details of the transaction at the meeting.

Minority demand breakdown of $34m cost involved in relocating Ameri deal
Member of Parliament for Bongo constituency, Edward Bawa

According to the legislator, “the company contracted to carry out the relocation of the plant is mytilineous international trading company, the same company that was involved in the novation and amendment of the Ameri contract that almost swindled Ghanaians but for the vigilance of the Minority.”

In March last year, the government disclosed its decision to relocate the Ameri Plant located at Aboadze to Kumasi in the Ashanti Region to help stabilise the national grid.

Majority Leader, Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu while presenting the 2021 Budget Statement in Parliament stated that although the country experienced adequate power generation capacity in 2020, this decision to relocate the Ameri Plant along with the completion of other power projects will help stabilise Ghana’s power supply.

“Mr Speaker, in 2020, the country had adequate generation capacity to meet the demand for domestic, commercial and industrial customers…In 2021, the Ameri Plant will be relocated to Kumasi to help stabilise the national grid”.

Background

The $510 million 300 MW AMERI power deal was signed between Ghana, under John Mahama, in 2015 and Africa Middle East Resources Investment Group LLC (AMERI) at a time when the country was reeling under a heavy power paralysis.  The deal with the AMERI LLC was to shore up Ghana’s power supply and to help solve what became known as the return of “dumsor” or power outages.

The then opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP) thought the deal was overpriced. Civil society groups, IMANI Africa and Africa Centre for Energy Policy (ACEP) shared this view.

A Norwegian newspaper, Verdens Gang, then published a news article suggesting that some government officials in the John Mahama administration paid a whopping $150 million to a middleman for little or no job done.

The story triggered a well of controversy and impetus to the criticism against the deal by the NPP, IMANI Africa and CEP. A 17-member committee led by lawyer, Philip Addison, by President Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo to investigate the details of the agreement, among other issues, advised the government to review the agreement with AMERI.

Following the recommendation of the Philip Addison-led committee to review the deal, the infamous Novated and Amended AMERI deal began.

Amid the criticisms, the deal reached Parliament under an Executive Order.

Critics were convinced that the Executive approval given for the deal is a testament that it failed proper scrutiny by two important ministries – the Finance Ministry (for value-for-money analysis) and the Attorney-General (for the legal implications of the new deal).

Civil society groups, the Institute of Energy Studies (IES), ACEP, IMANI Africa and the Minority National Democratic Congress (NDC) criticised the deal as worse than the previous arrangement.

ACEP estimates that the new deal would have cost the country over $937.5 million.

At the peak of the controversy, reports from sources close to the Presidency indicated plans to withdraw the deal from Parliament for a second look.

The deal was withdrawn and the then Energy Minister, Boakye Agyarko, the architect of the novation arrangement, was fired.


Source link

Back to top button